Main menu:

About

CruiseMates is an independently owned and editorially unbiased “Internet Cruise Magazine and Cruise Information Guidebook” offering accurate and up-to-the-minute cruise information and providing a place for cruise enthusiasts to meet.

CruiseMates is an independent cruise community not editorially affiliated with any travel agency or cruise line. We do accept advertising but our editorial material is never affected by paying advertisers; our editorial and advertising policies are clearly defined and do not overlap. We are advertising supported in order to keep our service free to our readers.

CruiseMates.com is an Internet Brands, Inc. website. Internet Brands is located at 909 North Sepulveda Blvd., 11th Floor, El Segundo, CA 90245

Here are links to the important policy statements in CruiseMates:

CruiseMates User Agreement and Terms of Service

 

Privacy Policy

Comments

Comment from Paul Torkoff
Time October 8, 2008 at 6:59 am

Now that the price of Oil & gas have dropped dramaticlly when will the fuel surcharge be dropped on cruises? ? ?

Comment from lbfunnyguy
Time October 22, 2008 at 10:44 am

okay if the economy is bad why doesnt the cruise lines give a discount on up grades,? i book the splendor e. carib.7 days jan3,09 they didnt budge one cent of the cruise price, when i called about upgrade to suiet they said 900 bucks more they wont take anything less? i had a upgrade last time,so why should i keep being a canival customer, they can give money off,there are plenty of sweets, left?? why dont they discount upgrades??? later

Comment from Effodoorift
Time December 19, 2008 at 8:25 pm

Seldom I write comments but resource really cool

Comment from zoran
Time December 23, 2008 at 6:46 am

Costa Concordia- very low level of service, very expensive, very arogant company, all worst

Comment from jim
Time June 5, 2009 at 11:29 am

I am particularly concerned about “formal nights” aboard most ships…with the possible exception of Norwegian’s
“freestle”….to be specific, I’m really not interested in having to wear a jacket, and definitely not a tie, at any function…do I have a choice aboard a Celebrity ship (Millenium, in this case)? What, if any, are my options..do I simply have to forgo an evening meal if I choose not to dress ‘formally’?

Comment from порно видео онлайн
Time November 7, 2009 at 11:06 pm

good!!!!)

Comment from Leah Lapitan Torino-Holliday
Time July 24, 2011 at 5:08 am

My Carnival Dream turned into Carnival NIGHTMARE. Just experienced the worst customer service in my life, checking in for boarding on Carnival Dream! My nightmare started at the land Port, in Port Caniveral, when I was at the mercy of the Supervisory Customer Service Rep., Kathleen Bianchi due to my US Passport being left at home. I had been feeling ill that morning before leaving my WV home to catch a flight from BWI to ORL. I thought, I had placed my passport the night before in my purse, however, it wasn’t the case. Due to my honest mistake, I was treated like a 2nd class citizen. Instead of working with me for a resolution to my dilemma, Ms. Bianchi serviced me alright…without humility & dignity. Since my citizenship was in question, I provided my documents: faxed copy of my passport; a verification letter from State Department citing the section of the law of the INA (Immigration & Nationality Act), that established my US citizenship at birth, eventhough, I was born overseas; my Immigration Officer badge & credentials from Headquarters in Washington, DC, where I’m currently employed. I believed that I had sufficient evidence to prove my identity & citizenship. However, she had already made up her mind from the start that I will be denied boarding. She acted rudely & very biased towards me that she could care less about the gray or brown area in this scenario. She seemed to see everything as being black or white, in which I didn’t fit in to either one. According to her that a faxed copy of my passport could have been altered. When in fact, the last cruise I went on was with a group of 13 guests, (not even a year ago) 4 family members left their passports at home & faxed copies of their passports sufficed. When I was told verbally that my boarding was denied because Ms. Bianchi needed a “written” proof, I informed the rest of my family who are already on board about it. Now, I found Carnival Staff to be inconsistent with their policy implementation when my relatives on board seeked help from the Guests Services Officer, and that the Officer on board was going to consider the faxed copy of my passport as proof of my citizenship along with my other documents and allow me to board,which was contrary to Ms. Bianchi’s decision. When I mentioned the State Dept. letter, to satisfy her “written” requirement, she stated that she would need to discuss it with Customs. She must had forgotten that I requested to see a Customs or an Immigration Officer earlier. I was denied to speak to anyone higher than her because supposedly all the Officers had left for the day. Come’n, I’ve served more than 22 years in the Service and half of that time I was performing inspections at airports and seaports. I was also a Sr. Adjudications Officer in the Field, providing post academy training to newly hired Officers & re-certifying those who are ready to become Journeymen Officers. There must be someone we can call in case of emergency or when issues of citizenship & identity arise.
Ms. Bianchi waited until the last minute to provide me with her written denial letter. First, she made me sit in a marked or roped area that appeared to be a holding area. She pretended to discuss my letter with Customs when I could see her laughing and gigling with one of her staff at the farther end of that area. I haven’t committed a crime, yet I felt like I was detainee. I asked where the ladies room was, and sure I was escorted by one of her staff just to use it. What was she worried about? She must had been afraid that I would breach security. She really underestimated me because she called on a security lady officer from TSA’s area to keep an eye of me & my colleague. At one point, that security told me & my friend to not speak to each other before she boarded and I exited the area. When it comes to security concerns, she should have seen it in one my credentials that I have a “2″ security code; meaning, I have a TS (top secret) clearance. My colleague who was cruising with me, addressed the fact that in order for an individual to become an Immigration Officer, one must be a US citizen. Ms. Bianchi responded to her right away, “that’s mixing up apples and oranges”. Then, she proceeded to say, “it would be like me: I shop at Walmart and it doesn’t mean that I buy everything from there.” That’s the saddest analogy I’ve ever heard! Ms. Bianchi finally handed me the denial letter close to 4 pm (that’s when they go home & shuts down the customer service line), after being there for almost 4 hrs. trying to reason with her. Then she wanted to know if I will be joining the Ship or not, because if I will not…she can do something with my stateroom. I was furious to know that she implied of re-selling the room. I thought, I already paid for my room and my colleague/friend was my roommate. I definitely cannot reason with an unreasonable person, so
I sadly went home. I had to take a taxi from the port to ORL airport to catch the last flight out to BWI. Challenged by what Ms. Bianchi told me that I can’t meet up the Ship in the 1st port of call, Nassau because there wasn’t enough time for me to catch up. I would have to wait until the Ship reaches the 2nd port of call, St. Thomas. It make sense now why she handed me a new schedule for Carnival Dream because she was telling me that the schedule had changed. She had told me that the Ship will not leave Nassau until 4pm. As soon as I got home that night, I scheduled a flight to Nassau right away from BWI, for me to arrive before 4 pm. My actual flight was going to get me to Nassau at 2:35. I was instructed by Ms. Bianchi that I need to call the Ship’s hotline if I’m joining the Ship. I called and was told by the phone reps. that the Ship will leave Nassau at 2 pm. How can I catch up if by the time I get to Nassau, the Ship had already sailed away? Nothing else I can do but arranged another flight. Fortunately, I was able to fly out from another airport, Reagan National to get to Nassau before 2 pm. What an ordeal it was! Never again I would be cruising Carnival and I’m not hesitant to tell all my family & friends about it.

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time August 9, 2011 at 1:36 am

To understand why I have begun in recent months because of my publications Fine Art Registry – to provoke Franks. By measure, not normally corresponds to my philosophy, there are reactions by Theresa Franks, showing the true character of this lady!
For better understanding:
In 2008 I had my first contact with Fine Art Registry.
In the course of which I had asked Fine Art Registry “to give neatly journalistic work,” and not to report only one side, as it is for years by the media in Germany have been the case.

I suppose for example the so-called, for everybody’s publicly accessible forum at Fine Art Registry (Theresa Franks).
Theresa Franks gives the reader’s the impression, that this forum would be a public forum.
Theresa Franks gives to the readers of Fine Art Registry the impression that she would be happy to discuss constructively with forum participants in this forum.
Theresa Franks encourages the readers of Fine Art Registry in the description throughout this forum that they should be participating on this page necessarily.
Actually a great thing. But the fact is that this statement by Theresa Franks is a clear lie.
In fact, Theresa Franks has me, after I put in this forum two absolute critical contributions as a result of her reports within a few hours completely deleted from this forum.
Therefore is irrevocable the evidence provided that Theresa Franks is no public discussion desired on their own reports on the side of Fine Art Registry!
In Addition further proof of the fact of non-desired public discussion:
In fact, Theresa Franks has my reader’s reports to her You Tube videos deleted that for example acts about the Descharnes Clan, Frank Hunter and Bruce Hochman, and this with the fact that You Tube told me, “You are blocked from the owner of this video.”

Now there is the way of putting the question about this persons are my publications embarrass because they reveal their true character and how their expertise is!
I take for example Bruce Hochman:
Since a long time Mr. Hochman sold the little book “Les Tres Riches 678 Signatures de Salvador Dali”!
On his website he conveys, that this book is the panacea for the identification of Salvador Dali-signatures.
This begs the question if Mr. Hochman is well-known what’s the content in this book? I don’t think so.
So now something about this book and its editor:
I go back through my existing documents in the years 2002 to 2003.
Let’s start at a time before Theresa Franks had to deal at all with Salvador Dali and his printmaking products!
During this time I bought the following books:
Les 678 Tres riches Signatures de Salvador Dali
and
Catalogue of the unique Collection of more the One Thousand guaranteed genuine & original Engravings Woodcuts Lithographs of the Museu Perrot Moore, 1rst Edition MCMLXXXVIII.

In fact, both books are from the same editor!
In fact, both books are to be understood in dialogue with each other!

Mr. Hochman the fact is, that the editor of the 1rst Edition MCMLXXXVIII wanted to produce a second edition of this catalog, and Robert Descharnes prohibited it him, Quote from the editor, email 13. May 2004!

The fact is also that I had “demonstrably” with the editor of the above written books been in written contact. The topics discussed were:
Email 18th May 2004, how is the “original term” of Dali’s graphic print products to define.

Email 26-27. May 2004, question to about the stamp of the museum Perrot Moore on Dali’s graphic print products.

Question about print graphic series, which has Mr. Moore received by the editor with Dali’s signatures, and how is be seen the relationship with the information in the book Les Tres Riches 678 Signatures de Salvador Dali.

And now Mr. Hochman something very special:
Email 20th August 2004 with the question to the editor about Divine Comedy – Les Heures Claires!

Mr. Hochman, consequently at a long time before Theresa Franks had begun “in public” accuse this company owing to fakes!

In this email it turns the question of special leaves with Dali – ballpoint pen drawings, which have two hand signatures!
It was about the question – are these leaves “authentic”!

It went further to the question:
Has the editor of above named books that sort of leaves from Les Heures Claires seen, and this in what year? And when were these sheets produced for his opinion.

Further the question – the publisher of the above books know, whether Salvador Dali was paid for the additional drawings?
Mr. Hochman, what do you think has the editor given me all these questions answered?

The fact is Mr. Hochman, the editor of the above books answered my questions.

Finally, this:
As far as me is known (2005) writes Gala-Salvador Dali Foundation in their certificates about the Dali’s signature basically the following:

If doubts about the certificates the Foundation about Dali signatures on printed graphic products exist, it is imperative that these doubts are challenged by a graphologist.

And it requires the reason of doubt, that only sufficient material undoubtedly to real unquestionable Dali signatures supply which comes out of the period of the original edition to the from them (foundation) assess pieces.

I’m now at Divine Comedy – Les Heures Claires and this, which says the editor of “Les Tres Riches 678 Signatures de Salvador Dali” about it.
Email 04th August 2004:
The Dali-ball pen drawings on the pages of Dante – Les Heures Claires are from Dali.
He, Dali, has made these little drawings in the 70s.
I myself (so the above named editor) have seen those sheets 1979 at Les Heures Claires.
He, Salvador Dali, was also paid for it.

The fact is that the above leaves of Les Heures Claires “two manual signatures” have which are attributed to Les Heures Claires.
An additional for the small drawing, the other was already present on this page from the past.

This begs the question – how can Theresa Franks maintain that “the first type” of the signature is wrong, if Dali himself had made these sheets with a small drawing?

This means that the statement by Theresa Franks concerning the forgery is not tenable and is contrary to any clean journalistic work!

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time October 30, 2011 at 1:13 pm

Well, the obvious question:
What will happen after the “publication” by Michael Wilson:
„Theresa Franks: True Colors. One Woman´s Quest Control the Art World”??
Must not all involved lawyers, who had carried the wrong play of the Franks, dissociate themselves from this lady publicly!
In one of my reports „Literature“ I had written the following:
Even among this group of people, there is a conscientious and professional ethics and objectivity.
This profession ethics of a lawyer’s seems to be a foreign word for lawyer Steven A. Schwartz.
Fact is these people cannot be responsible attorneys in sense of the law, Zitat Ende.
Should not all those who the call of the Franks for bringing an action against the Park West Gallery have complied are distancing themselves “publicly” from the Franks to come not under suspicion of collaboration.
E.g. in the case “Sharon Day” I go as far and say that the Descharnes clan had his hands in this play by the purchase and was subsequently staged to discredit Les Heures Claires. And this to give Nicolas Descharnes a position in a so-called Holy Dali world in the United States.
Should not all those against the Park West Gallery had filed a lawsuit senses come to one’s senses and filed a class action suit against Fine Art Registry Theresa Franks?
Our thanks to Michael Wilson!
Our thanks to Bernard Ewell and his insistence on the truth!
A thank you to all those others!
But it is only a partial success and the struggle for truth must go on!

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time November 27, 2011 at 12:34 pm

I think each of the publications of the email between myself and Fine Art Registry – David Phillips – has read it, is themselfs conscious that “Theresa Franks” already at the beginning of Campania against Park West Gallery – Albaretto – Les Heures Claires – “not” truthfully informed its readers.
The fact is that companies and individuals must be against protected, that through this “not truthful” information at websites such as Fine Art Registry will be harmed them!
How as this protection is guaranteed and what penalties are imposed must courts decide.
However, in order to understand this is exactly the case of Theresa Franks, however, requires years, since the context of inaccurate and incorrect statements are hardly understandable for laymen!
That’s why the jury of Michigan in the short time was not able to see through these connections.
So scribbler of 01 November 2011, a question for you:
Why Theresa Franks has at the beginning of Campania against the family Albaretto (April 22, 2008) does not inform their readers accurately, and has thus acted against his better knowledge?
I await your answer!
The fact is, this Campania would had yield differently if Theresa Franks would had started their Campania correctly with the truthful information “No fakes of Albarettos in Germany”.
But let me turn now again to Germany:
Fact is, Ernst Schoeller tries to be a small media star in the German investigators art scene in Germany!
In the case of “Dali” he tries due to inexact informations – and here in particular of the printed graphic products Albaretto collection – through the medium of German media to profile!
This is evident in several former publications in German media and on this side of the Fine Art Registry.
A German lawyer aptly describes it all:
The reports are owes due well-known “publicity-addiction” of the Commissioner.

Fact is, Ralf Michler had from the beginning of 2001 about 200 of Dali’s forgeries (forgeries of originals) let produced and they “personally” signed with Dali.
Ralf Michler was in the year 2006 convicted in Germany and is thus one of the great Dali forgers.
What the U.S. is not as well known, however, is as follows:
Ralf Michler was a close associate of Ernst Schoeller up to 2004th.
Ralf Michler was with Ernst Schoeller, the pivotal person in the seizure of printed graphics products from the collection in Germany Albaretto.
And here, specifically, he had declared before the German prosecutor, that the type signature on the printed graphic products of the Albaretto collection are forgeries.
This means the person (Ralf Michler), who testified in Germany, it would be incorrect signatures on the printed graphic products of the Albaretto-collection, was one of the largest of Dali forgers ever.
Accordingly, are all his information about alleged forgeries from printmaking-products of the family Albaretto not tenable.
However, in order to know what the interconnections between Schoeller – Michler and their statements to interpret Dali’s graphic art products is, the must spend years to study to understand for example, that in Germany Schoeller has power of intimidation.
And he (Scholler) needed Ralf Michler in the past to impound Dalis, because he (Scholler) could not und wanted not for the “publics” position itself as a Dali expert, but only as a policeman.
For him (Schoeller) the position as a police officer is much more important!

On the one hand, he thus has a high immunity in Germany. On the other hand, is the door for prosecutors and judges therefore far opened.
And by exactly through this Sybiose could the duo Schoeller- policeman / Michler-expert in the matter of printed graphic products of Dali’s in Germany doing things how they wanted.
And because Ralf Michler is not longer credible, it was also with a attempt to positioned Nicolas Descharnes as an expert about Dali’s signatures on the printed graphics-products, and this especially for the European space!
Only this thing was going backfired, because Nicolas Descharnes could not suppose that I came into possession of a transcript by a German district court, in whose content the statement by Nicolas Descharnes says that he stood at a federal court in the United States as an expert about the signatures Dalis.
In the U.S. media is however to read up on that the statement by Nicolas Descharnes is wrong and he was never an expert in the United States.
But readers of this site, this is just the tip of the iceberg!

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time December 11, 2011 at 8:56 am

Scribbler – Anonymous – 1 November 2011, what’s going on, where’s your answer?
Readers of this page:
The fact is, “Theresa Franks’ campaign against the family Albaretto would have to start correctly: “No counterfeits of originals and print-graphic products of the Albaretto family in Germany.”
The fact is, “Theresa Franks” behaves through “unrestricted” publication of inaccurate and false information against their better knowledge.
Accordingly, the claims of the Park West Gallery against Theresa Franks are perfectly understandable!
But I come to this:
Summary of “signature” types on the leaves Dante with pen drawings, which are attributed to Les Heures Claires.

The fact is I am in possession of documentation on the above signature types.
The fact is, these documents come from many different sources!
This includes witnesses – Publishers – Dali experts – gallery owners.
The fact is, this documentary begins in 1983 (therefore before Robert Descharnes actually has written a book on Salvador Dali), so in lifetime of Salvador Dali and ends in 2007.
The fact is, these documents are in writing and states that are ascribed to the above signature types Salvador Dali.
Fact is, therefore there are feature of the identification of an authentic signature (signatures) Dali’s available.
Main part of this recognition is the connoisseurship and provenance, which can thus be derived, due to pressure other graphical products and the existing signature (signatures) to the artist Salvador Dali.
In fact, in the years 2000 to 2004/2005 by inaccurate and false statements by Ernst Schoeller and Ralf Michler will have been the Albaretto collection of graphic art products discredited in public.
With the result that all subsequent media reports, and especially those of the U.S. (from late 2005) are going out of an inaccurate and wrong “previous knowledge”.
The wellknown result (in Europe) and mainly the U.S. is, that by this false and inaccurate statements – from about 1997 to 2005 – about the Albaretto collection from “France – Descharnes Clan” and “Germany – Ernst Schoeller and Ralf Michler” has been done damage to the buyers of printmaking products of the Albaretto collection.
Obvious is this “snowball effect” of the inaccurate and false media reports as follows:
The fact is that at the end of 2001, the former “involved German prosecutors in Augsburg” in the case of alleged false originals at the Augsburg exhibition of family Albaretto “confirmed in writing” that she saw no reason for an preliminary investigation against the family Albaretto, because all public allegations by Ralf Michler and Robert Descharnes not been tenable, but mere “speculations”!
The fact is that on 23/11/2005 the then “involved German prosecutors in Mannheim” the investigation for alleged improper pressure graphical products from the Albaretto collection in the “case granary” and “confiscation in Turin” set, since all allegations of fraud by Ralf Michler and Ernst Schoeller not have been tenable, since most of these corresponded to no scientific basis and have also objected in the content.
Who now pursued this entire situation, will ascertain out that all media reports about alleged forgeries of Albarettos in Europe will be ended at the end of 2005 abruptly!
And this is evident in the actions of involved German prosecutors, which I have above named.
What, however, in the case of Theresa Franks is different than in other media-reports, which were to be read until early 2008 in the U.S. web is the fact that this lady had from the beginning of 2008 a different prior knowledge.
And this is also the reason why the spreading of false and inaccurate information by Theresa Franks in this case should be assessed differently than those of other media in the U.S.!
Theresa Franks has “intentionally by their ignorance” makes done a financial loss of the purchaser in the United States of printmaking products of the Albaretto-collection.
And readers of this site, here it doesn’t matter whether the buyer had purchased at the Park West Gallery or anywhere else in the U.S.!
It’s an interesting thing how this lady tried to wriggle out of.
In one of their latest reports this lady writes the following:
She emphasizes explicit that there are “older complaints’ exist about the Park West Gallery, as these which she published from April 2008.
Readers of this page, here I refer to two reports which I had placed in the forum by Fine Art Registry in process of time!

The fact is, Theresa Franks has cleared me as a forum participant and these reports completely for within a few hours from this forum.
Theresa Franks, now a public question to you:
Why have all these reports and me – as a forum-participant – deleted?
Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time December 27, 2011 at 9:57 am

Info:
Also on the latest page of Theresa Franks Fine Art Registry my comments on their reports will blocked.
Quotation:
Fine Art Registry® looking forward to changing it up in 2012
Google blog platform will also allow our members, readers, and visitors to be much more involved and interactive with Fine Art Registry with the ability to dynamically post comments to any of our articles, videos, and blogs posts. All of our old content will be archived and will remain on the Fine Art Registry web site and will be fully accessible to all.
Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time January 21, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Mr. Daniel Grant, I know the 1961 publication of the Print Council of America. As I recall, this was only a recommendation of the directive of original graphic prints. Isn’t it so, that it gives several reports about it, that in an original graphic print the entire printing process must be performed by the artist himself! Wouldn’t it true that thus an increase of 90% of all known artists including Picasso thus would have had problems? And this with the monitoring by the artist is just a trick by the art trade?
And what was with the duplication? Again, there are many different opinions!
Manual handpress or manual machine, this with the machine would be however industrial, right?
But it is not so, that an artist with his originality of the creator without the use of designated criteria of others or those of conventional printing techniques “to create originals” be able.
But I come back to Salvador Dali.
Dali offset graphic ‘Biblia Sacra Rizzoli “:
How?
The original edition of Rizzoli was award-winning in 1965 as Dali graphic print, and this with the support of Salvador Dali himself!

Salvador Dali himself has rated the importance of this issue in his graphic oeuvre very high!
Salvador Dali has added in 1978 an edition of the Biblia Rizzoli with a dedication and handed to the Spanish king during his visit to the Dali Museum in Figueras. About it there are documents from the former media reports from Spain.
How?
Theresa Franks FAR has publicly allege since circa 2008 that these leaves are simple posters and this people, who have had purchased these prints, would have been deceived.
This raises the question of which is deception going on here?
I know three books from the years 1984, 1988 and 2003, which describing these sheets in their manufacturing technology.
In one of these is described as follows:
It is reported that Salvador Dali had created the templates exactly for this offset process!
It is further reported that the Rizzoli master printer with the artist Salvador Dali have had collaborated closely! It will describe that through the use of all special typographic possibilities, that a variety of up to 15 mats and glossy impasto (pastosen) and transparent colors was applied. And this is heightened in part, complemented with gold and bronze!
The author writes: Dali exhausted all graphic tricks and created somewhat completely „outstanding“.
Incidentally, the above book author has received in his home country, the Honorary Cross for Science and Art. Further, he has including books on Picasso, Ernst Fuchs and, of course, about Salvador Dali written.
Theresa Franks FAR noted in a video that halftone dots are present on the Biblia Sacra and Rizzoli and has therefore referred to these papers as posters.
What Theresa Franks, however, conceals its readers, is the fact that the Biblia Sacra Rizzoli has to be interpreted in their entirety and not only selectively by a small section under a microscope. If Theresa Franks in their video would have published one of the cutouts under the microscope, which the pastosen or which show increases also gold and bronze, and explained that Salvador Dali also worked closely with Rizzoli and its master printers together, then another impression would have developed over this printing graphic product Dalis.
How?
The spectators were deliberately misled by the video!

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time January 29, 2012 at 2:25 pm

The report by Theresa Franks FAR. :
“Park West Gallery’s lone Dali expert Bernard Ewell dead wrong—AGAIN”.

Is based on speculation!

The fact is and remains, the above-mentioned lady has “lied” since the beginning of campaign against the family Albaretto!

The fact is that the relationship between Dali and the family Albaretto was so closely that Salvador Dali had the “sponsorship” by Cristiana Albaretto (now Cristiana Albaretto Cristini) taken over!

And that this ceremony, which calls by the way the church „honorary post” is something special, it is everyone clearly who itself with it busy!

And here it doesn’t matter whether a photo says anything or not!

It does not matter whether a paparazzi-clan has thousands of photos or a Christian family has hundreds of photos!

Nearly it seems in such a way so, that Theresa Franks was godfather of these devils, since she is with their confused campaign again and again the Christian ethics „ thou shalt not lie” roughly disregarded!

Mr. Daniel Grant,
to understand that Theresa Franks FAR has played since a long time a false game with her readers, should also know this:

In early May 2010 I had under the user name “. … … ….”
in the forum of Fine Art Registry, under the heading “Park West Auctions” two written reports, which can be substantiated by documents.

Now a part of this excerpt:

Freiburg-Kornhaus-Germany, Les Heures Claires / Albaretto.
The fact ist that the disclosure of the alleged falsification of prints in the case of Freiburg-Kornhaus-Deutschland Les Heures Claires / Albaretto is wrong!

For this I have received several official letters.

The fact is that the German prosecutors had to return the seized from Ernst Schöller prints in the case of Freiburg-Kornhaus-Germany Les Heures Claires / Albaretto with available from 23.11.2005 to the owners!
And so with the addition that the Albaretto’s must be compensated by the German Treasury for its fact!

David Phillips, now I have doubts about the creditability of Fine Art Registry!

Because now it is known that the German prosecutor has returned the seized from Ernst Schöller prints to the owners, and thus not excluded that Park West has acquired some of these returned prints, so I ask the question why Fine Art Registry these prints from Park West called the fakes!

Augsburg, 140 from the collection of originals Albaretto, September 15, 2000 – November 26, 2000: This must be said that I in possession of letters from the German prosecutor Augsburg am I confirm that all information about alleged falsification of originals are wrong!
This includes the press reports that Robert Descharnes had this issue as it may indicate the Fine Art Registry report, LA RAZON, Sunday 12 November 2004
their readers suggest!

The German public prosecutor had decided that the preliminary investigations by Ernst Schöller not in this case could provide evidence of forgery, as his entire scientific research is extremely buggy!

I feel in my reports just to Salvador Dali, and not about to discuss any misconduct, adopted in labor! In Germany there are special courts for it to resolve these issues if an employee is not treated properly or not!

These courts observe whether allegations of any kind are allowed or not!

What attracted my notice at Fine Art Registry – Theresa Franks, the fact that they worked to a large extent the so-called wrongdoing by an employer on its website, which, however, has to do with the actual question of art by Salvador Dali nothing!

In fact, the German public prosecutor in Mannheim has returned the seized from Ernst Schöller prints of Les Heures Claires – Albaretto, the owners Albaretto!

The fact is that the German prosecutor noted that Albaretto for their circumstance of the investigation (based on Ernst Schöller) in Germany, the German treasury is to compensate!

Fact is, therefore, that all contrary reports in the above case are false!!!

To me it almost seems that in the U.S. is sleeping giant, is lulled by untruth, starting from a Web page is only since the short on the market!

End of quote part!

Mr. Daniel Grant, readers:
The fact is that Theresa Franks me and mine reports within a few hours completely “erased” from this forum!

Mr. Daniel Grant, readers:
Isn’t it so that Theresa Franks FAR acts thus against better knowledge!

Mr. Daniel Grant, readers:
Isn’t it so that Theresa Franks FAR on purpose “misleading”?

That’s why should people internalize this:

You must give the devil not a hearing.
He will always seek to drive us to despair, after he has led us to evil!

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time February 7, 2012 at 3:11 pm

Hallo thefineartblog,
I give you and the readers now a demonstrable example of a “public valuation” of Dali’s Divine Comedy.
To explain:
This value determination was published in the German television on 24.11.2008 for millions of viewers!

At this value determination were two people involved:
Dr ……. National Graphic Arts Collection in Munich.
Dr ……. sworn expert in Germany.
This means that it was not a Sotheby’s or another auction house involved!
This means that not a Mr. Hunter, Mr. Ewell, Mr.Hochman, Mr. Descharnes, Mrs.Theresa Franks, Park West Gallery, Les Heures Claires was involved.
Both of these persons have the print graphic product, Field page 198, Purgatory Canto 7 / ML Band 2, page 107, Nr.1079, wood-block-signature and hand-signed signature evaluated.
The public valuation stating, that one of such work a value between euro 4,000 – euro 5,000 has!
I now take this sum as the valuation basis, so I put to you “thefineartblog” the following question:
Really was the price the park west Gallery in the year 2007 too high or not?
Perhaps worth mentioning is this:
Shortly after this TV show, I had contact with the transmitter, this was per postal and per email to 07. Jan. 2008.

Rainer Schickedanz
Hallo thefineartblog,
I give you and the readers now a demonstrable example of a “public valuation” of Dali’s Divine Comedy.
To explain:
This value determination was published in the German television on 24.11.2008 for millions of viewers!

At this value determination were two people involved:
Dr ……. National Graphic Arts Collection in Munich.
Dr ……. sworn expert in Germany.
This means that it was not a Sotheby’s or another auction house involved!
This means that not a Mr. Hunter, Mr. Ewell, Mr.Hochman, Mr. Descharnes, Mrs.Theresa Franks, Park West Gallery, Les Heures Claires was involved.
Both of these persons have the print graphic product, Field page 198, Purgatory Canto 7 / ML Band 2, page 107, Nr.1079, wood-block-signature and hand-signed signature evaluated.
The public valuation stating, that one of such work a value between euro 4,000 – euro 5,000 has!
I now take this sum as the valuation basis, so I put to you “thefineartblog” the following question:
Really was the price the park west Gallery in the year 2007 too high or not?
Perhaps worth mentioning is this:
Shortly after this TV show, I had contact with the transmitter, this was per postal and per email to 07. Jan. 2008.

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time February 24, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Fine Art Registry: Blog
Theresa Franks FAR
„One Smooth Stone Part 3: The Anatomy of Park West Gallery Dali Forgeries”

I think Theresa Franks was herself not aware of what she did!

Additional Questioned Signatures
“So-called Italian Signature,”
Q 10-11-12-( )-14-15-16-17-21.

Mr. Flynn compares these types of signatures of Salvador Dali in his expert’s opinion with photographically illustrated signatures in the book of Mr. Moore’s “Les Tres Riches 678 Signatures of Salvador Dali” and that, so Mr. Flynn, for the determination of Dali signatures forgeries.

The fact is that the publisher of this book to me in writing (2004) declared that this book was published in connection with the “Catalogue of Graphic Art of The Dali Museum Perrot Moore Cadagues!

This means that if Mr. Flynn takes the book from Mr. Moore as reference to the Dali signature, so is also so that the “written” and “photographic” Contents of the “Catalogue of The Graphic Art” of Perrot Moore is no longer call in question!

Readers of this page, it means a “revolution” of Dali’s graphic works!
The reasoning on this later.

I come now to Mr. Flynn and the signatures Q 10-11-12 – -14-15-16-17-21 () and those in the book Les Tres Riches 678 Signatures of Salvador Dali:

Readers of this page
Fortunately, I am in possession of “several” printmaking products Dalis and these of various publishers, and the book of signatures of Mr. Moore.

These include, for example. Leaves of the Divine Comedy with the “Italian Dali signature,” which Mr. Flynn as the Q 10-11-12 -( ) -14-15-16-17-21 titled.
This includes a sheet of printed graphics products of Dali, which were signed by Dali for the Museum Perrot Moore.

And a sheet of the printed graphics products Dali from 1967 (not Divine Comedy), which Mr. Flynn as a type Descharnes 7 (Known) titled and a “blind stamp” of a reputable publisher has, in turn, a strong similarity of the above “Italian signature “Dali’s shows.

Readers of this page, now when I compare these signatures and still take the expertise of Stefano Liberati – President of the European Union, Art Expert and Technical Advisor of the Tribunal Civil Court of Rome, I must say that the statement of Mr. Flynn is more as untrustworthy.

Rainer Schickedanz
24.02.2012

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time March 18, 2012 at 10:02 am

Theresa Franks

Quotation Theresa Franks:
Park West Gallery: Squealing Like a Stuck Hog
Frankly, this isn’t about “art” at all…it is about good vs. evil.
Quotation End.

If a web page suppresses the readers of this web page with full intention knowledge, so this web page acts badly opposite its readers, and cannot be as well evaluated!
I say to you that the ability distinguish at all “good and evil”, is bound to an individual self-awareness, on the other hand it presupposes a moral fortune ahead.
Theresa Franks has not, however, this moral property, because she has at the beginning of their campaign against Park West Gallery the readers of the website Fine Art Registry intentional prior knowledge what she had, embezzled!

Readers of this page, in one of my reports in the past I had written “”What would have been if the Franks Theresa campaign against Park West Gallery would have rightly begun: No falsifications of Les Heures Claires/Albaretto in Germany whether with originals or with printinggraphic products Dalis! “

Fact is, all those, which are involved in this campaign in the surrounding field by Theresa Franks also, from the outset implausible (improbably) would have become, it of falsifications would have spoken.

And exactly this question must confront itself a judge or jury of a court, in order to realize at all, with which snow ball system of the wrong data on the page Fine kind Registry one works.
Therefore, this lady does not have moral, this lady does act permanently against the Christian ethics „you should not lie “.

Now something at Mr. Hunter:
Mr. Hunter, if you already speak over so-called criminal machinations with the park west Gallery, so then you must also begin all false informations, which are widespread on the page Fine kind Registry reappraise and to place correctly.
As long as you don’t do this Mr. Hunter, you are not credible.

Next you should, Mr. Hunter, the readers let participate for example, what you hold of the judgment of 24 September 2001 BV Demart PRO ARTE (Descharnes clan) against N. V. INTERART-INTERGIFT.

Or how do you think about the fact of the decision of the prosecutor in Mannheim, 23.11.2005 and over the return of printing graphic works Dalis to the family Albaretto.
As you to certainly know that a German art investigator was thus referred into his barriers.

Or Mr. Hunter explain the readers of this page this:
Why the German art detective (who is in the video on the side next to Theresa Franks Fine Art Registry to see) in a book published in 2007 titled “Wa (h) re lies” ISBN 978-3-938023-34-1 writing the readers said that R. Michler (coauthor of the books M / L should have sold more than 200 counterfeit Dali originals.
And the regional court Munich I condemned R. Michler on 18.05.2006 in 108 cases of the falsification.
Mr. Hunter, you as a Dali specialist, can the readers determined declare whether Mr. Schoeller or the District Court of Munich 1 “is right.”
As a layman I can only say that if the District Court of Munich I “is right”, it is nevertheless true that Mr. Schoeller’s lying, right?
Like now Mr. Hunter? This should be known to you!
Or Mr. Hunter, interpret this page for the readers once the following text Fundació Gala-Salvador Dali of 10 November 2006, which is to be seen in conjunction with the Descharnes clan.

Quotation:
Dear Sir,
…….the Foundation only accepts the technical and scientific opinion of our own experts.
……
Yours sincerely,

Montse Aguer
Authorizing and Cataloguing Commission

Quotation end.

Mr. Hunter, I await your response.

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time March 20, 2012 at 1:56 pm

Like now Mr. Hunter, it are simple questions but where the answer remains?

Now something to “Mrs. Important “- Theresa Franks:
I think, you should the text „of the Foundation from 10 November 2006” for the readers of this side interpret.

First this:
This text is taken from a letter which the foundation had written to me to above date!

Mrs. Franks, now for it the text passage of the Foundation:
Comissio D’Acreditacio I Catalogagio

Mr. Rainer Schickedanz 10th November, 2006

Dear Sir,
…………….
the Foundation only accepts the technical and scientific opinion of our own experts.
We hope this information is useful

Yours sincerely

Montse Aguer
Authorizing and Cataloguing Commission

Mrs. Frank, I interpret as a layman the “written statement” of the Foundation as follows:
If the foundation with this written statement have “right”, so you Mrs. Franks can write about Mr. Descharnes and his son, what you want.

It, Mr. Descharnes, can hang itself so many medals around the neck, as he can only get.
Sotheby’s or Christie’s can Mr. Descharnes and its son as so-called experts present their own expert’s assessments over Salvador Dali like them want, it does not help.
Fact remains that the rights-successor of Dali’s does both persons not recognizes as the experts!

“Mrs. Important “- Theresa Franks, I am right in this interpretation, or say the Foundation Gala-Salvador Dali is wrong?

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time March 22, 2012 at 9:48 am

Which is me with Mrs. Importantly – Theresa Franks conspicuous, was is the fact that this lady on the page Fine kind Registry again and again confronts the readers over Salvador Dali with reports or videos, this into „the journalistic column“
Wishful thinking, fairy tales and for the most part “horrible garbage” fits!

I give the readers an example again:

Anyone on the Web the tragedy of “Mrs. Important” has seen has seen also determined the video with the German art detectives on the page Fine Art Registry.
One of these videos terminates the German art- investigator „roughly with these words“:

He would act again as at that time and sheets of Les Heures Claires / Albaretto in Germany confiscate, since it would concern falsifications.

Readers of this page, this is definitely a wishful thinking, what Mrs. Important – Theresa Franks in their mental image also still believes!
What with this mental image of this lady is fatal, however, is that this lady the viewers of the video thus present a fairy tale world, but this has the title of “journalistic horrible garbage!”

That the real world looks very different from and it is grounded in the following fact:

On 29.05.2009
confirmed me in writing the Mannheim senior public prosecutor, that Ernst Schoeller for a seizure, to graphic works by Les Heures Claires / Albaretto “not competent” but a German judge.

On 22/06/2009
the German art detective (see the videos on Fine Art Registry – Theresa Franks) has “confirmed in writing” that he is not responsible for the assessment of printmaking works by Les Heures Claires / Albaretto.

Readers of this page
Mrs. Important – Theresa Franks apparently confuses reality with the wishful thinking of a fairy tale world. The video has to be defined as horrible garbage!

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time March 27, 2012 at 12:09 pm

Like now Mrs. – important – Theresa Franks – Fine Art Registry,
like now Mr. Hunter,
I and the readers of this side expect your interpretation of the letter of the “Fundacio Gala-Salvador Dali” of the 10. November 2006!!!!!!!!
Mr. Hunter, by the way, it would be interesting for me what for a curriculum you can show to print- graphics products to Dali?
Nearly it seems so that you only profits from the name Albert Field!!!
Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time March 30, 2012 at 1:42 pm

Now a quotation of Fine kind Registry Theresa Franks:
Dalí Art Fraud
The following photographs have been provided to us by the Salvador Dalí Archives Ltd., of New York City. Their provenance is Mara and Giuseppe Albaretto, Turin, Italy.
These photographs have been scanned and distributed to Dali specialists around the world. The consensus? The vast majority of these works are fraudulent – not by the hand of Salvador Dalí.
We present these works here in their entirety, for all to see, the largest art fraud ever recorded; the largest art fraud disseminated to the world via the Internet. The perpetrators? Stay tuned.
Highly Suspicious “Dali” Works
Afterwards come some photographically illustrated originals Dalis.
Fine Art Registry Theresa Franks suggested with above text and photographs the readers of this page that it would be act a great suspicion of the forgery of the family Albaretto!
Which however this side and franc Hunter the readers intentionally suppresses is this:
Fact is that on following page a book is listed , whose photographic substance shows ca. 90% out of the works Dalis the Fine kind Registry suggested as falsifications!!!!!!!
http://www.salvador-dali.org/cataleg_raonat/fitxa_obra.html?obra=509
Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí
Bibliografia
Salvador Dalí. Doeken en aquarellen uit de Albaretto Collection = Salvador Dalí. Toiles et aquaralles de la Collection Albaretto = Salvador Dalí. Canvas and water-colours from the Albaretto Collection, Stichting Sint-Jan, Brugge, 1997, p. 54
© 2007 – Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí – Tots els drets reservats .
End of quote.
Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time April 9, 2012 at 4:08 am

Theresa Franks discredits publicly the Spain’s Gala-Salvador Dali Foundation:
Dali Fakes Galerie:
Theresa Franks designates 95 works from these Bibliografia of the Fundació Gala Salvador Dalí as falsification!!!

Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí:
© 2007 – Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí – Tots els drets reservats – Avís legal i Privacitat – Crèdits
Bibliography:
Salvador Dalí. Doeken en aquarellen uit de Albaretto Collection = Salvador Dalí. Toiles et aquaralles de la Collection Albaretto = Salvador Dalí. Canvas and water-colours from the Albaretto Collection, Stichting Sint-Jan, Brugge, 1997, p. 54

End of quote “Fundació Gala-Salvador Dali”.

As follows the side of the Fundació from 2007:
http://www.salvador-dali.org/cataleg_raonat/fitxa_obra.html?obra=509

Readers of this page now something from the web, quote:
Who ascertains the value of art?
A work of art with an unquestioned provenance is the most valuable; so the people who invest in art have established the means to verify the provenance of important works of art in order the retain the value in their investment.
The Dali art that has been sold by Park West is said to have been originally acquired from an Italian couple named Albaretto of Turin, Italy. The couple claims Dali created hundreds of original works personally for them under a casual relationship where Dali did not bother to establish the provenance of these works.
Quote end.

In fact has the Fundation Gala-Salvador Dalí, by the publication in 2007 of the written and photographic content of the book
“water-colors from the collection Albaretto Stichting Sint-Jan, Brugge, 1997, p. 54″
identifies as authentic and thus confirm the provenance of the works of Dali from the Albaretto Collection!
This means, however, it is apparent that Theresa Franks deliberately the provenance the works Dalis of the family Albaretto in the United States discredited by their Campania.
In addition a text from the Web for the readers of this side clarifies how the Fundació Gala Salvador Dalí stands at all to the statements of the Descharnes:
The lawyer for the Gala-Dali, Miquel Roca i Junyent, introduced last February a complaint against Robert Descharnes for misappropriation, fraud and continuing offense against intellectual property. The measure was adopted by the Gala-Dalí after that in February last year the Supreme Court to rule that this entity is one that must exercise the powers of management and exploitation of intellectual property rights arising from the work of Dali. The Ministry of Culture has repeatedly urged Demart to refrain from any action related to intellectual property of the painter.
End of quote.
The text comes from the Spanish!
Well once again a passage from an “official letter from the Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí:
Mr. Rainer Schickedanz 10th November, 2006

Dear Sir,
…………….
the Foundation only accepts the technical and scientific opinion of our own experts.
We hope this information is useful
Yours sincerely
Montse Aguer
Authorizing and Cataloguing Commission

Quote end.
Readers of this side, it exist further letters (e mail) between the Foundation and me, which the attitude of the Foundation from 10 November 2006, specified above, confirms, and here back going into the year 2005!!!!!
Lawyers of the Theresa Franks, I am not completely surely how long you your reputation as conscious lawyers of the rights jeopardize wants!
However, you should know – you too will be judged in the future how long you support the wrong game!
Finally, something important to the latest report of Ms. – Theresa Franks:
Wanna See the FAR® Trial Exhibit that Stomped a Hole in the Park West Gallery Dali Provenance Sham?
Fact is that in this written garbage much Descharnes clan is!
Mrs. Importantly – Theresa Franks – it writes that it is absolutely necessary in the court room to have been present, in order to see into the faces of the persons of park west Gallery.
I must say for myself that I have seen Descharnes in the hearing in the case of Germany Schwetzingen and it’s enough already.
Theresa Franks discredits a person who has worked with the Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí together. To the page: http://www.jjbiagini.com/
Robert Descharnes was in the 60 paparazzi photographer for Paris Match, a tabloid!
I think this is another journalistic scandal, which affords this lady in the public, and an affronts to the readers of Fine Art Registry.

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time May 28, 2012 at 2:01 pm

Mr. Hunter,

Mr. Hunter, please explain to the readers of this page what means for you „mutatis mutandis” the following „Spanish press report“, which is this very day to read in the Web:

The Ministry of Culture (Spain) has in 2000 repeated strong appealed to Mr. Descharnes (Demart 1984-2004) “all actions”, which in the connection with the “intellectual property” by Salvador Dali, to stop!

Mr. Hunter, as you as a so-called Dali expert with certainty knows the full text of this press release, it will be easy for you to explain the readers of this page what in 2000 the “current administrator rights Dali” wanted to say with it!

Mr. Hunter, this was not the time when you had begun to contact the Descharnes in Paris, in order to deceive Albert Field?
I think Mr. Hunter you know the letter of the 29. May 2001 with your „signature“, in which is to read clearly the word „Paris“, or?

Mr. Hunter, you should continue begin to explain the readers of this page, you why photographs of Dali – Originals on the page Fine Art Registry – Theresa Franks publish “in the report, Dali Art Fraud” and explain to the local readers that it is would acts about fakes.

Mr. Hunter, and even though you knew that these depicted photograph originals are in an Dali catalog are shown, which were listed by the Foundation Gala-Salvador Dali on one of your websites already in 2007 with!

Mr. Hunter, you know exact that you discredit with your incorrect action not only the family Albaretto but also the Foundation in Spain itself!

Mr. Hunter, how it would be if you so slowly will begin correctly the used printing technique at printing techniques Dali’s in your „sanctimonious expert’s assessments “to place correctly!

Mr. Hunter, could be it that you lie in your so-called expert’s assessments and their printing graphic techniques in writing nearly always wrongly?

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time January 30, 2013 at 10:08 am

Editor’s note:

The prosecution Mannheim has returned the by the criminal police Stuttgart confiscated print graphics from the Albaretto collection at the owners, because as has been found in retrospect that they were not fakes.
End of quote.

Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Rainer Schickedanz
Time January 30, 2013 at 10:09 am

http://www.welt.de/print-wams/article119678/40-000-signierte-weisse-Blaetter.html
http://www.welt.de/print-welt/article532074/Auch-Michelangelo-war-ein-Kunstfaelscher.html

Die Welt „40.000 signierte weiße Blätter“
and
Die Welt „Auch Michelangelo war ein Kunstfälscher“

Both reports have been written by Axel Springer publishing house.

I now could reach that the reports have been changed first of all so, that the editorial staff changed the reports with the information’s about your print graphics, that in “hindsight” brought out a annotation with the quote:
Rainer Schickedanz

Comment from Anthony Underhill
Time August 27, 2014 at 7:05 pm

I recently read Paul Motter’s article about Royal Carribbean Smart Ship. In his article Paul states: “The secret behind these advances is much faster Internet access provided by a network of low-orbit communications satellites from a company called O3B Networks. The satellites maintain geosynchronous orbit (an orbital period the same as the Earth’s rotation) at a much closer distance to Earth than satellites used by other cruise ships – allowing Internet signal transmission directly to the ship.” Paul Isaac Newton proved that your explaination of Orbital Mechanics is impossible. Geosysncrhonous orbits around Earth will always be at an altitude of 22,264 miles nm.

Write a comment