View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 18th, 2008, 11:48 AM
CanCanCase's Avatar
CanCanCase CanCanCase is offline
Senior Member
Cruise Maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 174
Default

There just isn't any comparison to make. If you want to see glaciers, go to a glacier (Hubbard, Malaspina, LeConte just to name a few). If you want to see a huge area (a bay, for example) that has many glaciers in or near the bay, go to Glacier Bay (although to do it justice, many feel you'll need days or weeks in Glacier Bay... it's really a HUGE area.) And, if you want to see a steep-walled, narrow fjord, go to Tracy Arm.

They're all quite different, and offer comepletely different opportunities for wildlife and ice viewing.

Oh, another difference is the best way to see each area.... Be sure to see Tracy Arm from a small boat, rather than a large ship, Glacier Bay can be experienced from most any size boat, and I don't think I'd sail to Hubbard Glacier on anything smaller than 500', unless I were in Yakutat for some reason already!

Have Fun!
-Case
__________________
The only way to keep everyone happy is to delete my signature completely.
If anyone wants advice from a life-long Alaskan resident, please don't hesitate to ask.
Reply With Quote