View Single Post
  #93 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2012, 11:56 AM
Snoozeman's Avatar
Snoozeman Snoozeman is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bosque County, Texas
Posts: 5,430
Send a message via AIM to Snoozeman Send a message via Yahoo to Snoozeman

Actually I think Trackpup and I agree on everything except the Panama canal part....A Panama Canal cruise on it's own is fine, but when there is a continuation that makes it a 'gray' area. The debark for the canal cruise could be considered an embark for the continuation cruise and when it then terminates in a different US port you have then violated the PVSA. If someone wants to make a point that it is just one cruise and not two then I can see that argument, but that is very iffy. It looks like some cruise lines may allow it. As I have said many times, I think violations happen much more than we know.
Ray McDonald / Snoozeman

My Personal Cruise Blog: My Cruise Blog

Future Cruises:
Carnival Triumph-Caribbean-7/28/2014, Carnival Legend-South Pacific-8/30/2014, MSC Preziosa-Mediterranean-10/25/2014, MSC Fantasia-Mediterranean-11/2/2014, Navigator of the Seas-12/14/2013, Norwegian Jewel-1/3/2015, Emerald Princess-1/11/2015, Carnival Freedom-2/2/2015, Carnival Freedom-2/15/2015.

Last edited by Snoozeman; February 24th, 2012 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote