View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old April 10th, 2006, 08:12 PM
Rev22:17 Rev22:17 is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,771
Default

Robbie H,

I have always said the bloody canopy should have been removed and saved as evidence. Would it break the case, nope but it would have made "RCI" look more like they were doing everything they could to help. But there I go being logical again.

Realistically, you can't expect people who work in other fields to think of these issues because they are not trained in law enforcement. The staff on the ship probably would have done so if either the initial (Turkish) investigators or the American F. B. I. agent who witnessed their work had simply asked.

That said, I think that the photographs of the bloodstains on both the canopy and the hull should be sufficient for evidentiary purposes.

Norm.
Reply With Quote