I just want cruisers to know that Holland America refused to give me a credit towards a future cruise when I cancelled a Mediterranean cruise due to begin 9/22, 10 days after the WTC attack. HAL chose an arbitrary cut-off day for credits/refunds as 9/18. Not only that, but the customer service rep I talked to on the phone was snippy and didn't offer to relay my comments or help me in any way. I will take cruises in the future, but not on HAL.
Would-be, Some date HAD to be chosen. What if the date had been 9/28 and your cruise had been scheduled for 9/29, or what about those people whose cruise started then? A cut-off date HAD to be made, it just so happened that your cruise was pas that date. Additionally there is nothing written or implied anywhere saying that they had to do even that! The terrorist attacks were horrible and shocked everyone with a brain, but no business can survive by just allowing people to change their minds at the last minute and hope to stay in business. Other lines did the same thing. It may sound harsh but that is what insurance is all about, insuring that you will not lose money because of something unexpected happening. I hope that you don't hold this against HAL or any other company or stop taking the best type of vacations on earth, cruising.
I can't imagine a line not giving credit toward a future cruise.
Maybe it's a financial decision based on their speculation for the travel industry and their company. If we give him a credit we're out the $ now and we can't afford to lose more $ on top of fewer new bookings and cancellations outside penalty.
As far as the cut-off date...I would think the basis for that decision was "when will air traffic resume to the point that we have a reasonable expectation that the majority of our passengers can reach point of embarkation" as opposed to "when do we think our passengers emotional shock will wear off and they will feel like cruising again".